Site Map  |  About  |  Contact Us  |  Calendar
Text Size
Increase Font Size
Decrease Font Size
Print

Organization


 

Judiciary

The Clayton County Juvenile Court is served by three full-time Juvenile Court Judges, with the Honorable Steven C. Teske serving as Chief Judge since July 2011.

The judges in the Juvenile Court hear all cases that come under its jurisdiction. This includes the arraignment, adjudication, and disposition hearings in matters of delinquency, unruliness, deprivation, and traffic. Detention hearings, to determine whether or not a child must remain in a detention facility pending further court action, are another responsibility of the judges. The judges of the Juvenile Court are responsible for issuing all orders of the Court as well as bench warrants, pick-up orders, and ex parte orders.

In addition to these types of cases, the Juvenile Court Judges are called on to hear a variety of special proceedings cases. These cases involve special circumstances such as permission to marry, extensions of custody, waiver of parental notification of abortion, expungement of a person's name from the state child abuse registry and the termination of parental rights. Our Juvenile Court judges are appointed by the Superior Court of Clayton County and also serve as superior court judges when designated to do so.

Of these special proceedings, perhaps the most extreme is the termination of parental rights. These highly emotional and sensitive cases involve the severance of any and all relationship between a parent and a child, opening the door to the possible adoption of the child. During the year 2011, there were 26 termination of parental rights cases filed in the Juvenile Court; of those, three cases resulted in the severance of the parents' rights.

CHIEF JUDGE STEVEN C. TESKE
The Honorable Steven C. Teske was appointed Associate Judge with the Juvenile Court in July 1999, and appointed Judge in July 2003. With the retirement of the Honorable K. Van Banke in July 2011, Judge Teske was appointed Chief Judge of Clayton County Juvenile Court. While on the bench, he has received the Scales of Justice Award from the National Association of Legal Professionals for "conduct that exemplifies the hallmark professionalism and ethical standards and inspires public confidence in the legal system", the Judge Romae T. Powell Award from the Juvenile Court Association of Georgia, the Community Service Award from the Clayton Chapter of the NAACP, and the Atlanta Journal-Constitution Hero of Open Government Award.

Judge Teske has served as the President of Georgia Council of Juvenile Court Judges. Judge Teske has been appointed by the Georgia Governor to serve on the Children and Youth Coordinating Council, Commission on Family Violence, Judicial Advisory Council for the Department of Juvenile Justice, Governor's Office for Children and Families, and the Federal Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice.

Judge Teske has written articles calling for reform in juvenile justice and child welfare that have been published in Juvenile & Family Court Journal, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, Juvenile & Family Justice Today, and the Georgia Bar Journal among others. He has testified before several state legislatures and Congress on detention reform.

JUDGE DEITRA BURNEY-BUTLER
The Honorable Deitra Burney-Butler was appointed to the Juvenile Court bench in January 2009. Prior to being appointed, Judge Burney-Butler practiced law for several years as both an Assistant District Attorney and in private practice where she practiced primarily Criminal Defense and Family Law.

Judge Burney-Butler currently serves as the lead judge for Deprivation Practices and Innovations, where she has been instrumental in automating many of the systems, documents and orders pertaining to deprived matters. In conjunction with the Deprivation Practices and Innovations, Judge Burney-Butler serves as the chair of the Disproportionate Minority Committee and co-chair of the Truancy Protocol Committee of Clayton County. Judge Burney-Butler also sits on the Advisory Board of ITT Technical School, Criminal Justice Section.

Judge Burney-Butler is a 1994 graduate of the University of Denver's College of Law, and is a member of both the Georgia and Colorado Bar Associations. Judge Burney-Butler is a member of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges and the Georgia Council of Juvenile Court Judges where she serves on the Delinquency and Deprivation Committees. She is also a member of the Clayton County Bar Association.

Judge Burney-Butler is the mother of one son and is involved in various capacities in many school and sports activities. Judge Burney-Butler is a member of Higher Living Christian Church in addition to many other community and religious organizations.

JUDGE BOBBY D. SIMMONS
The Honorable Bobby D. Simmons was appointed as a Judge of the Juvenile Court of Clayton County on July 1, 2011. Prior to his appointment to the Juvenile Court he served as the Presiding Judge of the Magistrate Court of Clayton County since June 23, 2006, and prior to that as Part-Time Municipal Judge of Forest Park, Georgia.

Judge Simmons is a 1986 graduate of Mississippi College of Law with a Doctorate of Jurisprudence. He was sworn into the Georgia Bar in June of 1986. He is a 1979 graduate of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences with a Bachelor of Sciences Degree in Radiologic Technology, where he minored in Business Administration and Computer Sciences. Additionally, he is a 1974 graduate of the University of Arkansas Medical Center's College of Health Related Professions in Radiologic Technology.

Judge Simmons' entire life has been about service of his fellow man whether as a Technologist, Radiology Department Manager, Lawyer, Judge, Sunday School Teacher, Deacon, Gideon or Board Member. Judge Simmons is a member of the National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges, The Georgia Council of Juvenile Judges where he serves on the Bench Book Committee, Technology Committee and Court Improvement Initiative Committee. He is a member of the Clayton County Bar Association serving as President for the 2011-2012 terms and has served as an officer in all other capacities. He is a faithful member of First Baptist Church Jonesboro where he serves as a Deacon, Choir & Praise Team Member, Sunday School Teacher and Faith Team Member, as well as a Representative to The Gideon's International serving as Vice-President of Fayetteville East Camp. He is also a member of the Board of Clayton County Community Services Authority. Judge Simmons believes, "Ignorance is simply not knowing, stupidity is having the opportunity to "know" and refusing to take it."

Administration

The daily operations of Clayton County Juvenile Court are administered by the Director of Juvenile Court Services, John P. Johnson, III. With more than 20 years of service with the Juvenile Court, Mr. Johnson oversees the operations of the Juvenile Court and its more than 60 employees. Also included in the administrative section of the Juvenile Court are the Chief of Staff Colin Slay, Office Administrator Janice Wilson, Coordinator of Grants and Staff Development Sheryl Teske, and the Juvenile Court Information Technology Coordinator Cassandra Watson.

Office of the Clerk

The Clerk of the Juvenile Court, Robin Austin, oversees a staff consisting of a Receptionist, an Assistant Clerk, and eight Deputy Clerks who perform a wide variety of important duties. The Clerk's office has the responsibility for the maintenance of all juvenile records. All cases coming into the Court are processed through the Clerk's office and files are forwarded to the appropriate department.

The Clerk's office is responsible for recording all traffic citations, complaints, petitions, motions and orders filed in the Juvenile Court. The tasks of typing delinquent and unruly petitions, assigning court appointed attorneys, scheduling hearings, issuing summons, notifying attorneys, scheduling interpreters, preparing calendars and recording case dispositions are also the responsibility of the Clerk's Office. In 2011, 3,174 complaints were filed, 1,867 petitions were processed, 4,394 hearings were scheduled, and 4,120 dispositions were entered.

The Clerk is responsible for the receipt and disbursement of monies for all court-ordered payments. These payments include restitution, child support, translator reimbursement, traffic fines, attorney fees, publication fees, copy fees and supervision fees.

The Clerk's office prepares records when cases are transferred to another court and prepares transcripts for appeals as required.

The confidentiality of Juvenile Court records is maintained through this office. The Clerk's office holds the responsibility for the sealing of juvenile records when ordered to do so by the Court. The Clerk's office oversees the maintenance of or the destruction of court records as provided by law.

Intake Section

The Intake Section of the Juvenile Court is responsible for receiving referrals from law enforcement officers, parents, school officials, and private citizens on children alleged to be delinquent, unruly, deprived, or who have been cited for a traffic violation. Intake Operations is served by an intake supervisor who is responsible for a staff of three full-time court officers, two part-time juvenile court officers, and an Intake Assistant.

DELINQUENT AND UNRULY CASES
When a private citizen files a complaint alleging that a child has committed a delinquent or unruly act, the intake officer must prepare the case paperwork for the Assistant District Attorney (ADA), who in turn, investigates and determines whether there is probable cause to believe the child committed the act. Juveniles are generally not detained on private citizen complaints. When a child has been charged by the police with a delinquent or unruly act, the police officer is responsible for conducting the investigation. After a child is charged by the police, the intake officer assesses the information to determine how the case should proceed. This assessment includes obtaining police reports, staffing cases with probation officers, ADAs, or other pertinent individuals. The intake officer may divert cases to informal processes such as mediation, counseling, informal adjustments, or set the case for court before a judge. If a child is charged and taken into custody by the police, the information is immediately processed and the intake officer makes a decision whether to detain or release the child. If a child is detained for a delinquent offense, an informal hearing will be scheduled within 48 hours. If a child is detained for an unruly offense, the hearing is scheduled within 24 hours. Informal hearings are conducted by a judge for the purpose of officially making a decision on probable cause and further execution of the case. When the detention occurs over the weekend or during holidays, where the informal hearing cannot be set within these parameters, an informal staffing is held with a judge to determine if there is probable cause.

Many minor charges qualify, based on certain criteria, to be selected for diversion, informal adjustment with conditions, or mediation with conditions. In these situations, no formal court action is necessary.

DEPRIVATION CASES
In addition to their handling of delinquent and unruly complaints, intake officers are routinely called on to handle cases alleging deprivation. A deprived child is defined by statute as a child who is without proper parental care or control, subsistence, education as required by law, or other care or control necessary for his physical, mental, or emotional health or morals; has been placed for care or adoption in violation of law; has been abandoned by his parents or other legal custodian; or is without a parent, guardian, or custodian. These cases come primarily from three sources: The Department of Family and Children Services, law enforcement, and private citizens.

The Department of Family and Children Services is often the complainant. The intake officer facilitates the processing of the petition from the Department of Family and Children Services and plays a coordinating role to some extent in efforts made by the agencies involved in the placement of the child into shelter care or with a relative. The intake officer schedules these cases for their first appearance before a judge.

If a police officer encounters a situation in which there is probable cause to believe that a child is deprived and in danger from his immediate surroundings, he may take the child into protective custody and deliver him to the Court. In this instance, the intake officer is responsible for contacting the Department of Family and Children Services to investigate relative placement. If no relative can be located, the Department of Family and Children Services can place the child pending court action. The intake officer is also responsible for scheduling these cases for their first appearance before a judge.

Frequently an allegation of deprivation is made by a private citizen or a family member such as a grandparent. This allegation is outlined in a pre-screening form that is forwarded to the Department of Family and Children Services for investigation. If substantiated, the Department of Family and Children Services will file the petition seeking custody on behalf of the petitioner. In the course of this investigation, an evaluation will be made of the situation of the current legal custodian as well as the appropriateness of the home of the petitioner. At the completion of this investigation, a hearing is scheduled and the investigative report is presented to the Court for consideration and a determination of the most suitable placement is rendered.

During 2011 there were 839 petitions alleging deprivation filed in the Juvenile Court. Of this number, 476 petitions were filed by the Department of Family and Children Services, 95 petitions were filed by the police, and 152 were filed by private citizens or relatives. The remaining 116 petitions were filed by other persons such as school officials, probation officers, attorneys, etc.

Balanced and Restorative Justice (BARJ) Division

DIVERSION AND COURT ALTERNATIVE SERVICES
Informal adjustments and diversion programs are appropriate for complaints filed by law enforcement or other individuals in which the juvenile is alleged to have committed a delinquent act which is not of a serious nature, or has been alleged to have committed an unruly act, but appears to be amenable to informal handling. Program data for 2011, indicates there were over 600 cases referred for informal processing and screening and more than 200 informal contracts were initiated and monitored for a period 90-180 days.

The Screening Process
Delinquent and unruly complaints referred to Diversion Services are screened towards first seeking an informal adjustment of the matter where it is in the best interest of the child and the community. The juvenile complaint is examined to determine if the child is eligible for an informal adjustment/diversion, and/or mediation based on the totality of the child's circumstances, which may include, but are not limited to, age at the time of offense, nature of the delinquent act, ability of parents to correct the child, resources available in the community to provide treatment without need for formal court supervision, parent's ability to provide treatment for their own child, correction or discipline already provided by the parent and/or school system, the remorse of the child and parent's understanding of child's need for correction, and to avoid overburdening the juvenile court and probation with cases that can be handled informally. After contemplating the above mentioned factors, the child's disposition may result in a decision to recommend dismissal, to make a referral to another agency for services, to informally adjust the case, to file a petition, or to take other appropriate action.

Meeting the Criteria
In order to qualify for an informal adjustment the following must take place: the admitted facts must bring the child within the jurisdiction of the court, it must be determined that counsel and advice without an adjudication would be in the best interest of the public and the child, the child and the child's parents, guardians, or other custodian must consent to the informal adjustment with knowledge that consent is not obligatory, and if the child is alleged to have committed a designated felony act as defined in O.C.G.A. §15-11-63, the case shall not be subject to informal adjustment, counsel, or advice without the prior written notification of the district attorney or his or her authorized representative.

Informal Adjustment Agreement
If it is determined that the child shall be placed on an informal adjustment agreement, the agreement will be monitored by a juvenile court officer for a period not to exceed three months from the day of the informal hearing at which the counsel and advice was commenced. The court may extend the informal contract for a period not to exceed an additional three months. Conditions of the informal adjustment agreement may include but are not limited to: letters of apology, essays, reports, study log, volunteer work with a community service organization, counseling (e.g., individual, group, anger management, grief and loss, substance abuse), random alcohol/drug screening, parent/child participation in a court sponsored program and/or activity, supervision fee, ankle monitor, curfew, and house confinement. Failure to comply with the agreement may result in the filing of a petition on the complaint.

PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND SERVICES
The Program Services staff coordinates programming that is delivered to youth who come to the attention of the Juvenile Court. Youth on probation, as well as, those who are supervised under an informal contract are referred to these programs by their supervising court officers. First-time offenders are sometimes given an opportunity to have their charge dismissed by completing a program or workshop.

Through a cooperative agreement entered into by the school system, local police departments, other interested agencies and the Juvenile Court, School Resource Officers can refer students to the Conflict Resolution Workshop for certain "focused acts" without filing a complaint for the delinquent act. The goal is to expose the students to information that can help them avoid further conflict. In addition, school principals can use the first two outreach programs listed below as an alternative to out of school suspension.

Most programs offered by the Juvenile Court require parental participation, which empowers the parent to reinforce the information at home, thereby increasing the court's effectiveness with their children. The first three programs listed below are open to the public and parents can bring their children at their discretion.

The goal of the Programs Unit is to develop quality programming that is both cost effective and specific to the needs of the children. The providers for these services include both court personnel and community agencies.

How Quality is defined:

  • Meeting the need of Juveniles, their families;
  • Being based in research with proven effectiveness;
  • Validating results of our programs through multiple and accurate evalutions; and
  • Communicating effectively with other agencies and partners in the community.
Our guiding principles:
  • Making a positive difference in the lives of the juveniles we serve;
  • Being partners with the school district, communities and families we serve;
  • Achieving measurable results from programs we use on behalf of the court;
  • Ensuring that every programs team member has a great place to work by fostering a culture of professionalism and respect; and
  • Building our future on sound programming management practices and striving for excellence in every aspect of our work.

OUTREACH PROGRAMS
The three programs listed below are available to the general public.

Project HIP: is a collaborative effort between Hearts to Nourish Hope, the Riverdale Police Department, and the Juvenile Court. This program gives youth a true picture of prison and gang life as told by young adults, provides interactive panels for parents and teens with school personnel, law enforcement and community service providers as well as offers opportunities for making community connections to resources that may be helpful for participants and their families. This program is held one Wednesday a month from 6:30 to 8:30 pm.

Conflict Resolution: addresses problem solving and conflict resolution strategies whether the conflict is in a classroom, at home, or results from an on-going emotional issue. This program includes a real-life simulation exercise that promotes positive resolution of issues, working collaboratively to solicit responses and solutions, and teaches skills that can be applied in other settings. This program is held one Thursday a month from 6:30 to 8:00 pm.

Girls Talk: Provides a place where girls ages 14-17 can talk to girls their own age about the issues facing young women today, receive support and advice from professionals and have fun. This program takes place at Hearts to Nourish Hope on Tuesdays from 6:30-7:30 pm.

The programs listed below are available to Court involved youth ONLY via a referral from the assigned probation officer:

Introduction to Juvenile Court: All juveniles placed on probation are ordered to attend this program with parent(s). It is a one-time session lasting for up to an hour and thirty minutes that reviews juvenile court terminology, the juvenile court process, terms and conditions of probation, sealing a juvenile record and much more. This program is held one Tuesday a month from 7:00 up to 8:30pm.

Baby Think it Over: A computerized doll, resembling a human infant, is programmed to mirror the needs of a real baby showing teens what parenting is really like. During the two to three day parenting simulation period, the teen is responsible for recording the feeding, diapering, rocking, burping and other care-givers responsibilities. The internal computer records data about the teen's performance and summarizes the data in a simple assessment of care provided to the probation officer.

Evening Reporting Center (ERC): An alternative to detention for juveniles who violate probation or are awaiting adjudication. Probationers meet five days a week from 4p.m. to 8 p.m. at the center. The ERC staff transports the child to and from the program.

Law Related Education Series: Increases students' knowledge of the law, explains the purpose of the Juvenile Court, distinguishes between the consequences for the different levels of offenses under the law and describes how juveniles' lives can be affected by the charges they receive. This is done in collaboration with the District Attorney's Office and the Clayton County Public Schools.

Second Chance Court: Meets every Tuesday evening from 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. in the courtroom of Judge Steven Teske. For those youth with alcohol and drug issues there is a drug and alcohol counseling component that takes place every Monday evening for those in phases 1 and 2 of the program. In addition, there is family group therapy on Tuesdays after 2nd Chance Court from 6:30 to 7:30 p.m. and a Cognitive Behavioral Therapy class on Thursday evenings. Second Chance Court is an alternative to designated felony sentencing a youth for up to 60 months of restrictive custody at a Youth Development Campus. Participants are court ordered to this program.

Personal Space: An eight hour Saturday workshop requiring youth and their parents to participate in discussions that explore personal boundaries, effective communication, and making good choices.

Choices: Meets for four consecutive evenings (M-Th) from 6:30 pm-8:30 pm and addresses making good choices and issues associated with the use of illegal substances. Appropriate for families with any of their members struggling with these issues.

Theft Prevention Workshop: An eight hour Saturday workshop requiring youth and their parents to participate in discussions that explore the reasons for and the consequences of stealing as well as effective communication and making good choices.

MEDIATION SERVICES (ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION)
Alternative Dispute Resolution is a term that describes a number of processes used to resolve disputes as an alternative to formal processing of complaints. These informal processes include negotiation, conciliation, mediation and arbitration. ADR processes provide a less formal, less adversarial and less expensive method of addressing disputes. Courts have increasingly utilized these methods as tools to alleviate crowded calendars.

In the fall of 1986, the Juvenile Court of Clayton County implemented the Mediation Program. This action was taken to supplement the court's existing restitution effort. That program later evolved into Alternative Dispute Resolution. The program employs a full-time program coordinator, a full-time juvenile court officer, and a part-time program assistant. Mediators used in the program are selected from the community with various backgrounds, are registered with the Georgia Office of Dispute Resolution, and have completed a juvenile mediation training course.

In 2011, there were over 350 cases assigned to ADR for screening and processing. Of those cases, more than 200 youth were monitored for a period of 90-180 days. ADR's goal is to assist the youth in successfully closing his or her case while providing education about the law and promoting accountability and restoration to the victim.

What is Mediation?
Mediation is an informal process in which the parties involved are empowered to resolve their own differences with the assistance of a neutral third party, the mediator. Mediation is a voluntary process as the parties voluntarily agree to work together to resolve their differences. The parties may solicit legal representation, but it is neither necessary nor mandatory in this setting. The main focus of mediation is not to prove guilt or innocence, but rather to address the charge, identify the conflict, clear up any misunderstandings, and attain a resolution that is workable for all parties involved. Furthermore, mediation creates a forum for accountability and provides the respondent with an educational awareness about the law as it relates to juveniles. Mediation opens the door to bridge and nurture broken relationships while creating new alliances.

What is the Process?
Complaints received at the Juvenile Court are screened through the Intake Division of the court and forwarded to the ADR Unit for mediation. In most instances, the cases involve property damage, loss of property, or school and family related issues. The program also mediates grandparent petitions and deprivation issues as ordered by the judge. Once a case has been identified as appropriate for mediation, the victim is contacted and invited, but never coerced, to seek a mediated solution. If the victim agrees, a mediation hearing is scheduled.

First, the goal of each session is to produce an agreement that is acceptable to all parties. During the mediation hearing the juvenile is encouraged to be accountable for his/her actions. Secondly, the objective is for the juvenile to gain a perspective that will assist in altering his/her thought process, thus preventing him/her from reoffending. The juvenile and the victim also participate in a "brainstorming" process facilitated by the mediator to determine possible resolutions. In many cases, the agreement will consist of restitution to the victim and participation of the youth in a workshop provided by the court to address the behavior. Failure to comply with the terms of the agreement may result in the matter being set for a formal court hearing presided over by a judge.

The mediation program has successfully addressed shoplifting cases involving merchants in the community and property damage cases involving private citizens. In addition, the mediation program has been effective in handling school-related offenses and neighborhood conflicts. Other means of addressing juvenile complaints includes Peace Making Circles and Redemption Hearings.

JUVENILE DETENTION ALTERNATIVES INITIATIVE
The Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative (JDAI) is a 20-year-old project of the Annie E. Casey Foundation (AECF). According to AECF's website, "JDAI is one of the nation's most effective, influential, and widespread juvenile justice reform initiatives." JDAI is primarily focused on the use of detention by the juvenile justice system; over the past three decades, a large body of research has documented the dangers of using detention inappropriately. AECF contends that "youth are often unnecessarily or inappropriately detained at great expense, with long-lasting negative consequences for both public safety and youth development." For more information on JDAI, please visit The JDAI Help Desk.

Clayton County became a JDAI replication site in 2003, as a response to the tremendous stress on our juvenile justice system. Extremely high referral rates, primarily a result of minor school offenses, led to all-time-high probation caseloads and recidivism rates. Graduation rates were also at an all-time low. Since 2002, our JDAI programs have had a profound impact on outcomes for youth involved with Clayton County Juvenile Court:

  • The average daily population in detention has decreased by 62%;
  • The average daily population of youth-of-color in detention has decreased by more than 57%;
  • Detained youth now spend 36% less time in detention pending disposition (translating to a little over one week less than in 2002);
  • We commit 25% fewer juveniles to the Department of Juvenile Justice;
  • We commit 47% fewer minorities to the Department of Juvenile Justice;
  • Only 1% of juveniles released on detention alternatives are re-arrested before disposition; and
  • Juvenile petition filings have decreased by nearly 63% (2011 JDAI Annual Results Report).

Our JDAI Coordinator manages two of the most prominent JDAI programs in Clayton County, the award-winning Finding Alternatives for Safety and Treatment Panel (FAST Panel), and the Clayton County Collaborative Child Study Team (Quad-C ST).

FAST Panel
The FAST Panel is a multi-disciplinary detention review committee that meets every Monday, Wednesday and Friday to review the cases of youth who have been detained. The objective of the panel is to identify resources that might enable the youth to be safely released from detention pending the final disposition of the youth's case. The panel is made up of trained community volunteers, community-based service providers, probation officers, and agency representatives of our collaborative partners. For more information on becoming a FAST Panel volunteer, please contact our JDAI Coordinator, Shannon Howard, at (770) 473-5977 or email him.

Quad-C ST
The Quad-C ST is another multi-disciplinary panel of community-based service providers and the agency representatives of our collaborative partners that serves as a single point-of-entry for access to available resources. Partnering with the Clayton County Board of Education's System of Care, the Quad-C ST staffs the cases of students exhibiting at-risk behaviors with the goal of providing services that might prevent the student from formal involvement in the juvenile justice system.

Probation Section

The Probation Section of the court is divided into two types of functional units, Court Operations and Field Operations. In 2011, the probation section processed approximately 54 cases each month; of those, 70% were placed under an order of probation or supervision, most of whom were determined to be at a moderate- or high-risk for reoffense. The remainder of the cases presented a low-risk for reoffense and were dismissed, held in abeyance or placed under a suspended order of probation.

Court Operations
The Court Operations Unit consists of a supervisor, three juvenile court officers, and one part-time juvenile court officer.  The unit's primary function is conducting pre-disposition investigation and preparing social history reports for the disposition of delinquency and unruly cases that have come before the court for formal processing.  In addition to investigating and writing reports, the unit also supervises youth who have been conditionally released or otherwise placed under supervision orders pending the final disposition of their cases.  During 2011, the Court Operations Unit had 416 cases assigned to its members.

Field Operations
There are two Field Operations unit, each led by a supervisor who supervises six juvenile court officers.  Field officers conduct risk classification and needs assessment and write an individualized treatment plan for all youth placed on an order of probation using the Juvenile Assessment and Risk Instrument System (JARIS).  Field officers also provide ongoing supervision to those youth placed on an order of probation or supervision by the court.

In 2007, the Field Operations units moved to a school-based probation program is cooperation with Clayton County Public Schools; there is now a field officer assigned to each middle and high school in the system.  Research has shown that school-based probation allows for more frequent and better quality contacts that result in closer and more effective supervision of probated youth in addition to improved academic performance.

Field officers use a system of graduated responses (sanctions) to ensure compliance with court-ordered conditions and treatment-plan goals.  Sanctions range from verbal warnings to formal violations of probation that may result in detention, based on the severity, nature and frequency of the violation, relative to the risk-level of the probationer.  If it is determined that all appropriate community-based treatment options have been exhausted, the probation officer may recommend commitment to the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ).  In 2011, 3,310 counts of delinquency  and unruliness were filed against 2,134 children, and only 145 were committed to DJJ.

In addition to monitoring compliance, field officers coordinate rehabilitative and treatment services for probationers and their families.  These services are based on the needs identified by the child's JARIS.  Field officers evaluate the juvenile's progress toward achieving his or her probation goals and recommend termination of probation at the appropriate time.

In 2011, 873 juveniles were assigned to Field Operations; the average probation caseload was 16, consisting mostly of moderate- or high-risk offenders. Field officers initiated 3,870 face-to-face contacts with these offenders, most of which occurred in the juvenile's community. Field officers also participated in 11,318 collateral contacts, which consist of an array of educational, community service, treatment and family contacts.

Child Welfare Division

COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATED (CASA)
The Clayton County CASA program, a division of the Clayton County Juvenile Court, provides essential, high quality advocacy, intervention and support to children who have been the victims of abuse and neglect in Clayton County, who are in the care and custody of relatives, or are involved in custody dispute cases. Statistical evidence shows that as numbers of substantiated child abuse and neglect cases rise, so does the need for effective intervention and expansion of current program capability.

CASA programs represent a well documented and nationally recognized response to this growing need. CASA volunteers, serving as the child's own special advocate or Guardian Ad Litem, develop relationships with assigned children and families, enabling them to be a powerful voice and presence throughout the Juvenile and Superior Court process.
Trained CASA volunteers working in concert with the Juvenile Court, Superior Court, the Department of Family and Children Services, and others from the community, provide support services and bring relevant information, resources, and recommendations to the Court in the best interests of children. In 2011, 145 Clayton County CASA Volunteers advocated for over 600 children.

 

Mission Statement The Clayton County CASA program provides advocacy and intervention to abused and neglected children and Guardian Ad Litem services to children involved in custody disputes through commitment to the following program values:

  • Competent professional staff;
  • Supportive environment for recruitment, training and retention of volunteers;
  • Opportunities for volunteers to form caring, committed, relationships with child victims and their families; and
  • Provision of concise meaningful reports containing thoughful well-reasoned recommendations that assist the Court in meeting the needs of the child

 CASA is committed to these values equally in order to achieve its goal of providing a meaningful and effective volunteer for every child found to be deprived in Clayton County.

Other Volunteer Opportunities

Friends Of Clayton County CASA, Inc. - advisory board that advocates for the Clayton County CASA program by increasing public awareness, recruiting, and supporting volunteers, identifying individual and community resources and identifying professionals to serve on the board.

Ambassadors Behind CASA (ABCs) - a membership organization of volunteers whose purpose is to provide service to the Clayton County CASA Program as a partner to The Friends of Clayton County CASA, Inc. by increasing community awareness of CASA, supporting, developing, and implementing fundraising initiatives, and sponsoring activities for the children advocated for by CASA.

Team Guardian- a recruitment project targeting male volunteers at the Atlanta Motor Speedway.

The Darlin' Duck Derby - annual fundraiser to support the CASA program.

For additional information about Clayton County CASA or The Darlin' Duck Derby, visit our websites Clayton CASA and Ducks R Coming.

JUDICIAL CITIZEN REVIEW PANELS The Judicial Citizen Review Panel is a program of the Georgia Council of Juvenile Court Judges. It is a program designed to assist the court in determining what the most appropriate permanency plan is for children in foster care. Clayton County Juvenile Court started using the Judicial Citizen Review Panels in 1986.

The Judicial Citizen Review Panels consists of a cross-section of volunteers from the community, who undergo 2 days of specialized training from the Council of Juvenile Court Judges to acquaint them with the process of foster care review. Upon completion of training, the volunteers are sworn in as officers of the Court, to act in the best interest of the child.

Panel volunteers (known as Panel Members), serve on one of the nine Panels, who meet one day a month to review cases of children placed into foster care through the Court. The Panel's ultimate task is to see that the children are in a permanent home as soon as safely possible. Panel hearings are conducted with Panel Members meeting with DFCS case-workers, parents, the children, other family members, foster parents, services providers and CASA to review the progress of the parent or custodian, to ensure compliance with the court ordered case plan and to make sure that all necessary services are being provided to the family, as well as monitor the welfare of the children. Panel Members then make recommendations to the judge on what should happen next in the case. The judge then considers the Panel's recommendations. The judge has final authority in all matters.

During 2011, the Judicial Citizen Review Panels conducted 143 panels and helped to achieve permanency by closing 53 foster-care cases by either reunifying with parents, relative placement, adoption or independent living.

For more information about the Judicial Citizen Review Panel program, please call the program coordinator, Concilia Chilumuna, at (770) 473-3270, or email her.


 

Chief Judge: Steven C. Teske
9163 Tara Boulevard
Jonesboro, GA  30236
Main Number: (770) 477-3270
Fax: (770) 477-3255
Intake: (770) 473-5977
W/E: (770) 473-5975